European Union
In: The Basics
30 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The Basics
In: Journal of European public policy, Band 22, Heft 6, S. 871-887
ISSN: 1466-4429
In: Journal of European integration: Revue d'intégration européenne, Band 36, Heft 7, S. 715-730
ISSN: 1477-2280
In: Journal of European integration, Band 36, Heft 7, S. 715-730
ISSN: 0703-6337
World Affairs Online
In: Journal of contemporary European studies, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 77-89
ISSN: 1478-2790
In: Journal of contemporary European studies, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 77-90
ISSN: 1478-2804
In: Innovation: the European journal of social science research, Band 23, Heft 4, S. 297-311
ISSN: 1469-8412
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Band 47, Heft 4, S. 926
ISSN: 0021-9886
In: Review of international political economy, Band 13, Heft 5, S. 750-771
ISSN: 1466-4526
In: Handbook of European Union Politics, S. 561-576
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 48, Heft 4, S. 542-555
ISSN: 0010-8367
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 48, Heft 4, S. 542-555
ISSN: 1460-3691
In a recent piece in this journal Jørgensen and Valbjørn develop a typology of intellectual dialogue across fields that yields rather negative conclusions about the prospects for sustainable dialogue between 'European studies' and the 'new regionalism'. This response disputes this pessimistic conclusion. First, it is argued that while their derivation of models of dialogue is impressive, it is nonetheless incomplete. Using Jørgensen and Valbjørn's premises, the article derives a 'market' mode of dialogue that represents a challenge to their assumption that dialogue will tend towards hierarchy. Second, the article accepts that there are important 'sociology of knowledge' impediments to effective dialogue within political science and International Relations, but maintains that Jørgensen and Valbjørn fail to work through the question of 'dialogue between whom?' The article argues that methodological division is the most significant impediment to dialogue, but maintains that within-methodology dialogue is more than viable in the case under scrutiny in this debate. Third, having established these general parameters of disagreement, the article moves to a number of more particular criticisms of the assumptions made by Jørgensen and Valbjørn about extant calls for dialogue between scholars in these two fields.
In: The Palgrave Handbook of EU-Asia Relations, S. 108-123
In: Journal of European public policy, Band 18, Heft 7, S. 999-1015
ISSN: 1350-1763
World Affairs Online
In: Journal of European public policy, Band 18, Heft 7, S. 999-1015
ISSN: 1466-4429